looter
I beg to differ. Can you prove Darth Vader didn't exist 'a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away'?
And what's the difference between reading fiction in a book, even an old book, or watching fiction in a film?
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
looter
I beg to differ. Can you prove Darth Vader didn't exist 'a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away'?
And what's the difference between reading fiction in a book, even an old book, or watching fiction in a film?
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
looter-" a person never rails against something they don’t think exists. And that's fact."
Yes they do. Who didn't hate Bennett in the film 'Commando'? We loved it when Arnie sticks it to him.
Darth Vader... what a bastard. I know he turned good in 'Return of the Jedi' but I could never forgive him for killing Obi-Wan Kenobi.
The god of the bible. What a heartless wanker...
All fiction...
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
DJS-"I meant to call you a brain dead, emotion addicted, un-evolved, zombie theist who wouldn't recognize empirical data if it bit him on the ass and whose best-est friend ever, besides jesus, is confirmation bias."
LOL...And you wonder why you have a queue of stalkers...
im asking for you guys help in a phase im going through right now.
im sure it’ll pass but id appreciate your advice..
born in, my family consists of mum, dad, two brothers and two sisters.
It just takes time. This time next year you will read this thread and laugh.
Doing bad things can sometimes feel so good. Practice makes perfect.
People feel the same coming out of a controlling relationship. You have to learn to enjoy your new found and hard earned freedom. It will become natural soon enough.
31 is no age. If you have a dream, go for it.
now we all have heard how the universe is composed of matter and space.
and we always here of how it had a beginning.
but really what could have begun it?
"I`ll get you a Date with Divine!.."
Okay... you win...!!
Ribs and Eyeballs... sounds a bit like how the 'Divine' made Eve...
now we all have heard how the universe is composed of matter and space.
and we always here of how it had a beginning.
but really what could have begun it?
Outlaw...'you think you're a man...but you're only a boy'...LOL
now we all have heard how the universe is composed of matter and space.
and we always here of how it had a beginning.
but really what could have begun it?
Why does it have to be God? Why not a simulation?
now we all have heard how the universe is composed of matter and space.
and we always here of how it had a beginning.
but really what could have begun it?
looter-"If scientist don't blame it on dust and gravity then what do they blame it on?"
Nuclear strong force....?? nuclear weak force....?? electromagnetism...???
Have you done any research at all...???
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
Vidqun-"If it is a simulation, would you not need a creator to create the simulation (as in the Matrix Trilogy)?"
Not necessarily no. That's limiting outside the simulation to what the simulation is inside.
If outside the simulation is so vastly different to what we experience in the simulation then maybe there is no beginning and no end, no up and no down, in fact it could be void of dimension.
Wild speculation obviously but equally as valid as any theistic hypothesis when it comes to assuming an alternative. The only advantage with simulationism is that it can answer every question thrown at it.
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
Vidqun-" I stress the point, an information system cannot develop by itself or be derived from non-living matter."
But doesn't this point also work against theists inasmuch as the vastness of information required to create the Creator goes off the scale.
An old argument I know but what it does do is to highlight the folly of the assumption that there is a 'creator' (as in god of the bible) based on the above argument.
Vidqun-"So, what are the alternatives? You be the judge…."
There are alternatives that don't include a creator, like simulationism. If the information programmed in matter is created externally then an alternative explanation could be that we live in a simulation.
Therefore it is an assumption to believe in a creator when a simulation is an equally plausible explanation.